${site.data.firmName}${SEMFirmNameAlt}
Free Consultations
866-967-7235717-496-0070

We Advance All Costs - No Fee Unless We Win!

In this section
Review Us
Experienced trial lawyers With The Resources To Handle Your Case

NJ may stop enforcement of out-of-state camera tickets

Most states are always in a tension between how much traffic enforcement they employ and questions of safety. Obviously, if Pennsylvania had a state police trooper stationed every couple of miles along the roads and highways, few people would speed, drive drunk or engage in other unsafe driving violations.

On the other hand, the Commonwealth would almost certainly go broke under the weight of attempting to cover the payroll costs of thousands of additional state and local police. To stretch budgetary dollars, some jurisdictions have begun to employ mechanical methods of enforcing traffic laws, like red light cameras, as a means of reducing traffic violations and car accidents.

There is no free lunch, and with red light cameras comes issues of accuracy of enforcement and due process. Since the camera is attempting to take a picture of the license plate, the identity of the driver may not be clear.

This has led to complaints by individuals regarding the process, because it may be weeks later before a ticket is processed and mailed, and a driver may recall nothing about the incident and have little recourse but to pay the fine.

This is especially true for out-of-state drivers. Few are likely to drive back and hire an attorney to dispute a ticket from a state they passed through weeks ago during a vacation or business trip.

Two legislators in New Jersey are introducing a bill that would prevent that state's residents from receiving tickets from foreign jurisdictions. This already has happened in South Dakota, due to many complaints from residents who received tickets in Iowa.

Pennsylvania has no statewide program for use of red light cameras, but some have been used in Philadelphia and Pittsburg. No word on whether any Pennsylvania legislators are considering a similar bill.   

Source: The Washington Post, "New Jersey drivers may be able to ignore other states’ speed cameras," Sarah Ferris, August 4, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

what our clients say about us

  1. $5.5 Million

    Settlement for spinal injury caused by delivery company's negligent vehicle maintenance

  2. $5 Million

    Settlement for traumatic brain injury

  3. $1.2 Million

    Settlement (Liability insurance limits) for death claim arising out of tractor trailer collision

  4. $1 Million

    Settlement for closed head injury/facial fractures due to negligent construction site practices

  5. $1 Million

    Arbitration award in death claim arising out of motor vehicle collision

  6. $1 Million

    Total workers' compensation settlement for injured worker who suffered orthopedic injuries and additional GI injuries due to prescription medications.

  7. $1 Million

    Policy limits recovered for head injury sustained by the user of unsafe rental equipment.

  8. $890,000

    Settlement for head injury of injured worker caused by negligent operation of equipment by a non-employer contractor on the job site.

  9. $875,000

    Settlement for ankle injury due to negligent dump truck operation

  10. $675,000

    Settlement for bilateral wrist injuries caused by the negligent operation of a tractor-trailer.

  11. $600,000

    Settlement for statutory cap of $500,000 for wrongful death of a worker who was killed when struck by a government-owned vehicle as well as policy limit for underinsured motorist coverage.

  12. $$450,000

    Workers' compensation settlement for a nurse who sustained a low back injury requiring multiple surgeries.

  13. $375,000

    Settlement for knee injury sustained in a motor vehicle collision with contested liability.

view more
email us for a response

Call Us 24/7 To Discuss Your Case

866-967-7235 | 717-496-0070

Absolutely no fee

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy