${site.data.firmName}${SEMFirmNameAlt}
Free Consultations
866-967-7235717-496-0070

We Advance All Costs - No Fee Unless We Win!

In this section
Review Us
Experienced trial lawyers With The Resources To Handle Your Case

NHTSA accountability--where should it start? Part 2

The Toyota unintended acceleration issue has demonstrated, determining why systems fail in complex mechanical and software related interactions is no easy matter. NASA was brought in to assist NHTSA on that matter, and they concluded there was no defect in the electronic throttle control system.

Toyota attempted to disarm allegations of many of these accidents as being essentially user error, suggesting that that driver stepped on the wrong foot peddle as they panicked. 

Nonetheless, when a California State Trooper, his wife, 13-year-old daughter and brother-in-law were killed when their Lexus vehicle crashed after accelerating to speeds of more than 120 miles per hour, Toyota was faced with a worst-case scenario.

It was more difficult for Toyota to asset that a state trooper was unaccustomed to the operation of a motor vehicle and that he would have been easily confused or panicked by the acceleration of the vehicle.

The defense in that case was also disadvantaged by the frightening 911 recording of the brother-in-law calling during the final seconds before the fatal crash. After the crash, another driver who had received the vehicle from the dealership as a loaner experienced a similar, out-of-control acceleration by same the vehicle.

The sheriff's report on the accident suggested it was caused by an improperly sized floor mat placed in the vehicle by the dealership. The catastrophic damage was so great that it was impossible for investigators to examine the other electronic or mechanical systems for potential defects.

While NASA could not find any reproducible software errors and some vehicles seem to have suffered from "simple" problems, like incorrectly sized floor mats, the lack of certainty in the cause of these unintended acceleration accidents remains troubling.

In our next post, we consider what should be done to reduce the likelihood of these incidents.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

what our clients say about us

  1. $5.5 Million

    Settlement for spinal injury caused by delivery company's negligent vehicle maintenance

  2. $5 Million

    Settlement for traumatic brain injury

  3. $1.2 Million

    Settlement (Liability insurance limits) for death claim arising out of tractor trailer collision

  4. $1 Million

    Settlement for closed head injury/facial fractures due to negligent construction site practices

  5. $1 Million

    Arbitration award in death claim arising out of motor vehicle collision

  6. $1 Million

    Total workers' compensation settlement for injured worker who suffered orthopedic injuries and additional GI injuries due to prescription medications.

  7. $1 Million

    Policy limits recovered for head injury sustained by the user of unsafe rental equipment.

  8. $890,000

    Settlement for head injury of injured worker caused by negligent operation of equipment by a non-employer contractor on the job site.

  9. $875,000

    Settlement for ankle injury due to negligent dump truck operation

  10. $675,000

    Settlement for bilateral wrist injuries caused by the negligent operation of a tractor-trailer.

  11. $600,000

    Settlement for statutory cap of $500,000 for wrongful death of a worker who was killed when struck by a government-owned vehicle as well as policy limit for underinsured motorist coverage.

  12. $$450,000

    Workers' compensation settlement for a nurse who sustained a low back injury requiring multiple surgeries.

  13. $375,000

    Settlement for knee injury sustained in a motor vehicle collision with contested liability.

view more
email us for a response

Call Us 24/7 To Discuss Your Case

866-967-7235 | 717-496-0070

Absolutely no fee

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy