Free Consultations

We Advance All Costs - No Fee Unless We Win!

In this section
Review Us
Experienced trial lawyers With The Resources To Handle Your Case

Are more recalls a good sign for carmakers?

A former member of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and now the head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) suggests that in 2015 we could see even more recalls from the auto manufacturers, and that this will be a good sign. This comes on the heels of 2014, which set a record for the number of motor vehicle recalls.

This may be due to NHTSA become more aggressive in looking at the carmakers and of self-policing by the car companies, to avoid fines and the heightened negative publicity that accompanied both the General Motors ignition switch defect and the Takata airbag defect, which affected a large number of Honda models.

NHTSA has been the subject of much criticism during the last year from both Congress and the media for its slow response to these vehicle defects. The GM ignition switch defect has been linked to 42 deaths in car accidents, which occurred when the ignition turned off while the vehicle was in motion, in some cases, disabling the airbag.

The GM ignition defect had been seen in vehicle for 10 years, but neither GM nor NHTSA ordered a recall before last year. NHTSA had been responding to inquires about the defect with statements indicating they had insufficient evidence to even begin an investigation right up until the time GM initiated the recall.

Honda had been piecemeal recalling small numbers of vehicle that exhibited the signs of the defective Takata airbag for a decade before last fall when they finally ordered millions of vehicles recalled after recent fatal car accidents occurred with the airbag.

The administrator indicated that it is the car makers responsibility to notify NHTSA of defects and he is asking Congress to increase the amount a negligence manufacturer may be fined from the current $35 million to $300 million or more.

Reuters.com, "U.S. recalls may climb this year says car safety chief," Patrick Rucker and Ben Klayman, January 6, 2015

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

what our clients say about us

  1. $5.5 Million

    Settlement for spinal injury caused by delivery company's negligent vehicle maintenance

  2. $5 Million

    Settlement for traumatic brain injury

  3. $1.2 Million

    Settlement (Liability insurance limits) for death claim arising out of tractor trailer collision

  4. $1 Million

    Settlement for closed head injury/facial fractures due to negligent construction site practices

  5. $1 Million

    Arbitration award in death claim arising out of motor vehicle collision

  6. $1 Million

    Total workers' compensation settlement for injured worker who suffered orthopedic injuries and additional GI injuries due to prescription medications.

  7. $1 Million

    Policy limits recovered for head injury sustained by the user of unsafe rental equipment.

  8. $890,000

    Settlement for head injury of injured worker caused by negligent operation of equipment by a non-employer contractor on the job site.

  9. $875,000

    Settlement for ankle injury due to negligent dump truck operation

  10. $675,000

    Settlement for bilateral wrist injuries caused by the negligent operation of a tractor-trailer.

  11. $600,000

    Settlement for statutory cap of $500,000 for wrongful death of a worker who was killed when struck by a government-owned vehicle as well as policy limit for underinsured motorist coverage.

  12. $$450,000

    Workers' compensation settlement for a nurse who sustained a low back injury requiring multiple surgeries.

  13. $375,000

    Settlement for knee injury sustained in a motor vehicle collision with contested liability.

view more
email us for a response

Call Us 24/7 To Discuss Your Case

866-967-7235 | 717-496-0070

Absolutely no fee

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy