Free Consultations

We Advance All Costs - No Fee Unless We Win!

In this section
Review Us
Experienced trial lawyers With The Resources To Handle Your Case

The CDR backlog is the fault of Congress

The Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program faces many challenges. The Social Security Administration (SSA) must deal with issues ranging from the exhaustion of the SSDI trust fund and the potential for a substantial cut to benefit payments to allegations of fraud within the program.

The problems, of course, are all related and these complexities make it difficult to "solve" any single issue. For instance, the SSA has the task of reviewing recipients of disability benefits periodically to assess their condition and determine if they remain eligible for SSDI benefits. 

This is no simple matter. A Continuing Disability Review (CDR) is required to be conducted for beneficiaries on varying time schedules. For some, who are expected to improve, a CDR may be required within three years or less of the award of benefits.

For other conditions where improvement is possible, but where it is unclear if it will occur, the CDR is required every three years. The last category, where no improvement is expected, a CDR is still supposed to occur every three to five years.

This process is time consuming and demanding, the adjudicator must find "both that the beneficiary has improved medically in ways relevant to work and that he/she is, in fact, able to work."

This means the determination is neither quick nor easy. And this is where the problem with Congress enters. Funding dedicated to CDRs expired in 2003, and Congress has failed to adequately fund this process during the last decade. This has led to a 1.3 million CDR backlog.

In 2011, they authorized additional funding to resolve this backlog, but in the following three years only appropriated funds in one of those years. At this rate, it will take 30 years to eliminate the backlog, instead of the ten planned.

Adequate funding is necessary to preserve all elements of the integrity of SSDI program, and Congress needs to become serious and solve these funding issues.

ssab.gov, "2014 Disability Policy Panel: Continuing Disability Reviews," Social Security Advisory Board, December 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

what our clients say about us

  1. $5.5 Million

    Settlement for spinal injury caused by delivery company's negligent vehicle maintenance

  2. $5 Million

    Settlement for traumatic brain injury

  3. $1.2 Million

    Settlement (Liability insurance limits) for death claim arising out of tractor trailer collision

  4. $1 Million

    Settlement for closed head injury/facial fractures due to negligent construction site practices

  5. $1 Million

    Arbitration award in death claim arising out of motor vehicle collision

  6. $1 Million

    Total workers' compensation settlement for injured worker who suffered orthopedic injuries and additional GI injuries due to prescription medications.

  7. $1 Million

    Policy limits recovered for head injury sustained by the user of unsafe rental equipment.

  8. $890,000

    Settlement for head injury of injured worker caused by negligent operation of equipment by a non-employer contractor on the job site.

  9. $875,000

    Settlement for ankle injury due to negligent dump truck operation

  10. $675,000

    Settlement for bilateral wrist injuries caused by the negligent operation of a tractor-trailer.

  11. $600,000

    Settlement for statutory cap of $500,000 for wrongful death of a worker who was killed when struck by a government-owned vehicle as well as policy limit for underinsured motorist coverage.

  12. $$450,000

    Workers' compensation settlement for a nurse who sustained a low back injury requiring multiple surgeries.

  13. $375,000

    Settlement for knee injury sustained in a motor vehicle collision with contested liability.

view more
email us for a response

Call Us 24/7 To Discuss Your Case

866-967-7235 | 717-496-0070

Absolutely no fee

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy