Free Consultations

We Advance All Costs - No Fee Unless We Win!

In this section
Review Us
Experienced trial lawyers With The Resources To Handle Your Case

Does Congress really want to help disabled workers?

One of the complaints made against the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program is that it does not do enough to help those who are able to return to work. This is somewhat of a disingenuous assertion, because SSDI requires application to have been out of work for 12 months and for the medical condition or illness that has caused their disability to be unlikely to improve.

The program does have, however, some elements that facilitate a return to work for those who are able. For instance, it does allow beneficiaries to earn up to $1,090 per month by working before their SSDI benefits are reduced or lost. 

There is also the Ticket to Work program that allows disabled workers to "test the waters" by working without risking a loss of their benefits.

For beneficiaries who do return to work, but then are laid off, unemployment insurance programs provide additional help to replace that missing income from their job. Some in Congress want to eliminate the right to receive those unemployment benefits, accusing those individuals of "double dipping."

Given that the average 2015 SSDI benefit payment is only $1,165, receipt of temporary unemployment insurance is unlikely to make these individual feel as if they won the lottery. Let's remember, they were working and lost their job, and just like any other worker they are entitled to unemployment.

It is not a significant problem, as only 1 percent of disability recipients were receiving SSDI and unemployment and one study found that the average combined benefit was only $1,100 per month for these disabled workers.

If Congress really wants to help keep these workers in the job force, they need to do more to ensure they have the skills the labor market need and can find stable jobs to avoid the need for unemployment insurance,  rather than simply cutting them off and making their existence more difficult.

Americanprogress.com, "Cutting Social Security Disability Insurance Won’t Help Anyone Go Back to Work," Rebecca Vallas, April 14, 2015

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

what our clients say about us

  1. $5.5 Million

    Settlement for spinal injury caused by delivery company's negligent vehicle maintenance

  2. $5 Million

    Settlement for traumatic brain injury

  3. $1.2 Million

    Settlement (Liability insurance limits) for death claim arising out of tractor trailer collision

  4. $1 Million

    Settlement for closed head injury/facial fractures due to negligent construction site practices

  5. $1 Million

    Arbitration award in death claim arising out of motor vehicle collision

  6. $1 Million

    Total workers' compensation settlement for injured worker who suffered orthopedic injuries and additional GI injuries due to prescription medications.

  7. $1 Million

    Policy limits recovered for head injury sustained by the user of unsafe rental equipment.

  8. $890,000

    Settlement for head injury of injured worker caused by negligent operation of equipment by a non-employer contractor on the job site.

  9. $875,000

    Settlement for ankle injury due to negligent dump truck operation

  10. $675,000

    Settlement for bilateral wrist injuries caused by the negligent operation of a tractor-trailer.

  11. $600,000

    Settlement for statutory cap of $500,000 for wrongful death of a worker who was killed when struck by a government-owned vehicle as well as policy limit for underinsured motorist coverage.

  12. $$450,000

    Workers' compensation settlement for a nurse who sustained a low back injury requiring multiple surgeries.

  13. $375,000

    Settlement for knee injury sustained in a motor vehicle collision with contested liability.

view more
email us for a response

Call Us 24/7 To Discuss Your Case

866-967-7235 | 717-496-0070

Absolutely no fee

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy