${site.data.firmName}${SEMFirmNameAlt}
Free Consultations
866-967-7235717-496-0070

We Advance All Costs - No Fee Unless We Win!

In this section
Review Us
Experienced trial lawyers With The Resources To Handle Your Case

Legislation may defund motorcycle checkpoints

There are few more controversial topics among bikers than mandatory helmet laws. Through the early 1980s, states across the country made wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle mandatory, as a means of improving the chances of a rider in the event of an accident.

But then the backlash began. Anti-helmet forces lobbied to remove the requirement, and today, there are only 19 states with mandatory helmet laws. Pennsylvania's law only applies to riders age 20 or younger. Some of those groups are now working to prevent funding of motorcycle checkpoints, which many bikers see as discriminatory. 

These motorcycle groups favor training programs that improve rider's skills and prevent accidents. However, the statistics suggest that the training programs will need to improve a great deal.

Florida experienced 515 motorcycle deaths in the three years prior to the repeal of the helmet law. In the three years after the repeal in 2000, the death toll jumped to 933. Two-thirds of those who died were not wearing a helmet.

While many of the biker groups stress their freedom to choose and personal autonomy, there is a larger picture. When a motorcyclist is involved in an accident, the state police, county sheriffs, local fire departments and ambulance services must respond. The cost of these services are considerable and are borne, eventually, by everyone in Pennsylvania.

If a rider is severely injured, and suffers a traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, not only will they face tremendous medical expenses, and if your insurance compensation is inadequate, you may wind up on a government program like Social Security Disability, and may require additional support.

In Pennsylvania, if you are 21, the decision to wear a helmet is yours. But if you are injured, consider the potential price you will pay.

Usnews.com, "Biker Allies in Congress Want to Slam Brakes on Helmet Enforcement," Steven Nelson, April 17, 2015

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

what our clients say about us

  1. $5.5 Million

    Settlement for spinal injury caused by delivery company's negligent vehicle maintenance

  2. $5 Million

    Settlement for traumatic brain injury

  3. $1.2 Million

    Settlement (Liability insurance limits) for death claim arising out of tractor trailer collision

  4. $1 Million

    Settlement for closed head injury/facial fractures due to negligent construction site practices

  5. $1 Million

    Arbitration award in death claim arising out of motor vehicle collision

  6. $1 Million

    Total workers' compensation settlement for injured worker who suffered orthopedic injuries and additional GI injuries due to prescription medications.

  7. $1 Million

    Policy limits recovered for head injury sustained by the user of unsafe rental equipment.

  8. $890,000

    Settlement for head injury of injured worker caused by negligent operation of equipment by a non-employer contractor on the job site.

  9. $875,000

    Settlement for ankle injury due to negligent dump truck operation

  10. $675,000

    Settlement for bilateral wrist injuries caused by the negligent operation of a tractor-trailer.

  11. $600,000

    Settlement for statutory cap of $500,000 for wrongful death of a worker who was killed when struck by a government-owned vehicle as well as policy limit for underinsured motorist coverage.

  12. $$450,000

    Workers' compensation settlement for a nurse who sustained a low back injury requiring multiple surgeries.

  13. $375,000

    Settlement for knee injury sustained in a motor vehicle collision with contested liability.

view more
email us for a response

Call Us 24/7 To Discuss Your Case

866-967-7235 | 717-496-0070

Absolutely no fee

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy