Free Consultations

We Advance All Costs - No Fee Unless We Win!

In this section
Review Us
Experienced trial lawyers With The Resources To Handle Your Case

Or is it that other SSDI judges don't approve enough?

Scandal always makes good news copy. Even if there isn't one. In fact, a scandal that relies on innuendo and implication is the best kind of all, because it can never be refuted. Much has been made of the Social Security Administration's (SSA) disability program. It has grown large and costs billions every year, and much of that growth is the result of demographics and the aging of the American workforce. Yet many would like to imply that the growth is really caused by fraud.

If you have become disabled and are no longer able to work because of your disability, you may have applied for Social Security disability insurance (SSDI) benefits. And, like two-thirds of those who apply, you receive a denial. If you continue, you may eventually have a hearing in front of an administrative law judge, who works for the SSA, and reviews applications for SSDI benefits.

A judge in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania has been found to have the highest approval rate of any SSA judge in the nation. The news story implies he doing something wrong based on the fact that he awarded benefits to more than 15,000 individuals. This is "nearly double that of America’s next highest active judge." But story does not say how long have those other judges have served. 

The story claims his approval rate is six times that of the average judge. However, it provides no context for the average, nor it does not point to any particular cases that were inappropriately decided.

Interestingly, the story describes a women who is suffering from the rejection of a kidney transplant, had both hips replaced, suffered from shingles, a blood clot, and Schema Cell Carcinoma, while awaiting another kidney transplant. Her initial SSDI application was rejected, and she is now appealing that denial.

We wonder why her application was rejected, as given all of that, she would seem like an easy approval.

Which made us think, what if the real problem with SSDI is not that one judge has such a high approval rate, that all of the other judge's rates are too low? 

Source: Local21news.com, "Harrisburg disability judge awards billions in taxpayer money," Chris Papst, May 16, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

what our clients say about us

  1. $5.5 Million

    Settlement for spinal injury caused by delivery company's negligent vehicle maintenance

  2. $5 Million

    Settlement for traumatic brain injury

  3. $1.2 Million

    Settlement (Liability insurance limits) for death claim arising out of tractor trailer collision

  4. $1 Million

    Settlement for closed head injury/facial fractures due to negligent construction site practices

  5. $1 Million

    Arbitration award in death claim arising out of motor vehicle collision

  6. $1 Million

    Total workers' compensation settlement for injured worker who suffered orthopedic injuries and additional GI injuries due to prescription medications.

  7. $1 Million

    Policy limits recovered for head injury sustained by the user of unsafe rental equipment.

  8. $890,000

    Settlement for head injury of injured worker caused by negligent operation of equipment by a non-employer contractor on the job site.

  9. $875,000

    Settlement for ankle injury due to negligent dump truck operation

  10. $675,000

    Settlement for bilateral wrist injuries caused by the negligent operation of a tractor-trailer.

  11. $600,000

    Settlement for statutory cap of $500,000 for wrongful death of a worker who was killed when struck by a government-owned vehicle as well as policy limit for underinsured motorist coverage.

  12. $$450,000

    Workers' compensation settlement for a nurse who sustained a low back injury requiring multiple surgeries.

  13. $375,000

    Settlement for knee injury sustained in a motor vehicle collision with contested liability.

view more
email us for a response

Call Us 24/7 To Discuss Your Case

866-967-7235 | 717-496-0070

Absolutely no fee

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy