Experienced trial lawyers With The Resources To Handle Your Case
The national trial lawyers
Best law firms us news 2017
Super lawyers
Million dollar advocates forum
Multi million dollar advocates forum
AV preeminent martindale-hubbell lawyer ratings
Litigator awards

Franchise not responsible for workers compensation claim

Those who are familiar with the fast food and restaurant industry know that the franchise business model creates nuanced relationships between the franchise and the business owner. Franchisees are small business owners who purchase a “brand name” for their operation. They are required to uphold brand standards and keep in good standing with the national organization.

This arrangement also has an impact on employees of individual franchise locations, particularly in the area of workers’ compensation. A recent case here in Pennsylvania has potentially negative implications for franchise employees statewide.

Is a franchise responsible for an employee’s claim?

A state court took up this question last year after a franchise employee slipped and injured both knees in a Saladworks restaurant in March 2011. The injured employee filed a workers’ compensation claim with his employer (the owner of the local franchise). However, the owner did not have the necessary insurance to cover the employee’s injury.

The employee then filed a subsequent claim with the state’s Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund (UEGF), which provides benefits to employees who may not be covered due to their employer’s lack of insurance. UEGF filed a claim against the Saladworks franchise itself. However, Saladworks argued that it had no relationship with the employee.

The court ruled in favor of the Saladworks franchise and left UEGF and the employee without compensation. The UEGF and another state board then filed an appeal with the state Supreme Court, but the court denied the appeal in December 2016.

What does this ruling mean for restaurant employees?

The state Supreme Court’s ruling to uphold the decision in favor of Saladworks means that franchise restaurant employees who are injured on the job may not be covered if their employer does not have the required insurance.

The attorneys who represented the employee called the case “far from over,” but stressed that the responsibility is on store owners to carry the necessary insurance to cover injured employees. When looking for a job in a restaurant, potential employees may never consider the insurance the employer carries. An employer’s lack of proper insurance coverage may never be an issue until someone is hurt on the job.

Although the court ruled in favor of the franchise in this case, fast food and restaurant employees should not be discouraged. If you are hurt at work, you can still seek coverage by speaking to a workers’ compensation attorney.

FindLaw Network

$5.5 Million

Settlement for spinal injury caused by delivery company's negligent vehicle maintenance

$5 Million

Settlement for traumatic brain injury

$1.7 Million

Recovery for premise liability spinal cord injury, in which liability was disputed.

$1.55 Million

Workers’ compensation recovery for a partial leg amputation and traumatic brain injury, in which liability was disputed.

$1.2 Million

Settlement (Liability insurance limits) for death claim arising out of tractor trailer collision

$1 Million

Settlement for closed head injury/facial fractures due to negligent construction site practices

$1 Million

Arbitration award in death claim arising out of motor vehicle collision

$1 Million

Total workers' compensation settlement for injured worker who suffered orthopedic injuries and additional GI injuries due to prescription medications.


Settlement for head injury of injured worker caused by negligent operation of equipment by a non-employer contractor on the job site.


Settlement for ankle injury due to negligent dump truck operation


Recovery for a premise liability wrongful death and survival action, in which liability was disputed.


Workers’ compensation and personal injury recovery for foot injury and toe amputations.


Settlement for bilateral wrist injuries caused by the negligent operation of a tractor-trailer.


Workers’ compensation recovery for a fatal claim, in which liability was disputed.


Settlement for statutory cap of $500,000 for wrongful death of a worker who was killed when struck by a government-owned vehicle as well as policy limit for underinsured motorist coverage.


what our clients say about us

“I would like to sincerely thank you for your efforts in resolving my personal injury case. The consistent professionalism you and your firm provided demonstrated exactly how law is suppose to be handled. You helped to change my life and I will forever be in your debt.” - Satisfied Client
“It was not an easy road for us but we knew that we had a great attorney that cared about his clients. You are a fantastic attorney.”
“Just wanted to thank you again, so very much, for the TLC given us during our unfortunate situation; so greatly appreciated the ease and smoothness of handling things – you had so much to do!”
view more