Experienced trial lawyers With The Resources To Handle Your Case
The national trial lawyers
Best law firms us news 2017
Super lawyers
Million dollar advocates forum
Multi million dollar advocates forum
AV preeminent martindale-hubbell lawyer ratings
Litigator awards

Injured by a defective product? Strict liability may prove useful

You and most other people undoubtedly use some sort of manufactured product daily. These products can have a variety of uses, and you likely do not often give these products a second thought as far as causing you unexpected harm. Unfortunately, some foods, electronics, medical devices and even furniture could have defects that cause them to put consumers at risk of suffering serious injuries.

If you have suffered serious harm due to the use of a defective or dangerous product, you may wonder whether you could pursue a lawsuit in hopes of gaining compensation. Luckily, you have the right to move forward with legal action against the party or parties considered liable for your injuries.

Strict liability

Even though three different theories could potentially apply to a liability case, strict liability acts as the most commonly used. This path allows you to file a claim against the maker or seller of the product that resulted in your injuries. With strict liability, you do not necessarily have to prove that the maker or seller acted negligently. Even if you do not have proof that careless actions on a manufacturer’s part caused the negative outcomes, legal responsibility may still fall to them.

Necessary conditions

Though you do not need proof of fault, conditions do exist that you must meet in order for your claim to have merit. These conditions include:

  • Suffering injuries due to an unreasonably dangerous defect of the product
  • Your use of the product did not go against its intended purpose
  • The product had not undergone modifications to change its performance

Liability exceptions

Although you do not necessarily have to prove the manufacturer or seller’s fault, strict liability does not always mean that the company automatically accepts liability. For instance, if you owned the product for an extended period of time, the company could argue that you had awareness of the defect yet continued to use the product anyway. In such a case, your claim may not seem as strong.

However, the manner in which you present your claim could have a considerable effect on the outcome of your case. Therefore, you may wish to find out more information on strict liability for defective products, along with how it could affect your legal claim.

In order to ensure that you have fully assessed your situation and understand your options, you may wish to consult with an experienced Pennsylvania attorney. This assistance could ensure that your case presentation proves effective.

FindLaw Network

$5.5 Million

Settlement for spinal injury caused by delivery company's negligent vehicle maintenance

$5 Million

Settlement for traumatic brain injury

$1.7 Million

Recovery for premise liability spinal cord injury, in which liability was disputed.

$1.55 Million

Workers’ compensation recovery for a partial leg amputation and traumatic brain injury, in which liability was disputed.

$1.2 Million

Settlement (Liability insurance limits) for death claim arising out of tractor trailer collision

$1 Million

Settlement for closed head injury/facial fractures due to negligent construction site practices

$1 Million

Arbitration award in death claim arising out of motor vehicle collision

$1 Million

Total workers' compensation settlement for injured worker who suffered orthopedic injuries and additional GI injuries due to prescription medications.


Settlement for head injury of injured worker caused by negligent operation of equipment by a non-employer contractor on the job site.


Settlement for ankle injury due to negligent dump truck operation


Recovery for a premise liability wrongful death and survival action, in which liability was disputed.


Workers’ compensation and personal injury recovery for foot injury and toe amputations.


Settlement for bilateral wrist injuries caused by the negligent operation of a tractor-trailer.


Workers’ compensation recovery for a fatal claim, in which liability was disputed.


Settlement for statutory cap of $500,000 for wrongful death of a worker who was killed when struck by a government-owned vehicle as well as policy limit for underinsured motorist coverage.


what our clients say about us

“I would like to sincerely thank you for your efforts in resolving my personal injury case. The consistent professionalism you and your firm provided demonstrated exactly how law is suppose to be handled. You helped to change my life and I will forever be in your debt.” - Satisfied Client
“It was not an easy road for us but we knew that we had a great attorney that cared about his clients. You are a fantastic attorney.”
“Just wanted to thank you again, so very much, for the TLC given us during our unfortunate situation; so greatly appreciated the ease and smoothness of handling things – you had so much to do!”
view more